About Cascade CMS
Cascade CMS is a web content management system from Hannon Hill that allows users to manage their websites efficiently while supporting scalability. It provides features such as collaboration, personalization, and content improvement so organizations can effectively engage their audiences. Cascade CMS supports diverse industries and services, offering tailored solutions to meet specific needs. It allows users to create, edit, and publish web content with ease, while maintaining brand consistency across digital platforms. Key capabilities: collaboration tools content personalization user-friendly interface scalable architecture reliable security Best for: organizations that need a flexible and efficient content management solution.
Cascade CMS Details
Cascade CMS's In-App Market Place
Does Cascade CMS have an in-app market place?
Yes
How many Mini-Apps in the marketplace?
1
Mini Apps
N/A
Pricing Options
Accepted Payment Currencies
USD ($), EUR (€), GBP (£), AUD (A$), CAD (C$), JPY (¥), CNY (¥), INR (₹), MXN ($), BRL (R$)
Pros & Cons
- Easy to Teach and Use: Many reviewers found it easy to train new users, even those without coding knowledge for basic edits.
- Good for Website Design: Specifically mentioned as a great tool for website design.
- Easy to Edit and Publish: Users can quickly make changes and publish web pages.
- Helpful for Accessibility: Features aid in fixing accessibility issues, like the straightforward "deeplinking" functionality.
- Good Organizational Features: Reviewers appreciated the organizational capabilities of the CMS.
- Easy Integration of Third-Party Widgets: Allows for easily incorporating external tools and functionalities.
- Excellent Backlogging and Archiving: Provides good features for managing past versions and archiving content.
- Intuitive Integration: The integration is user-friendly.
- Good Support: Customer service is generally rated highly.
- Search Function Needs Improvement: Multiple reviewers found the search functionality lacking, with difficulties in filtering and finding specific content, especially on large sites.
- UI Could Use Work: Some users felt the user interface could be improved.
- Disconnect Between Editing and Live View: One user expressed frustration with the difference between the editing interface and the final published look.
- Motion in Site Content Panel: One user found the animation in the Site Content panel distracting and hindering speed when navigating many pages.
- Layout Adjustment Limitations: While pre-made layouts are nice, adjusting them can be difficult.
- Desire for Direct HTML Editing: One user preferred to work directly with HTML rather than the built-in editor.
- Occasional System Crashing (Past Issue): One user mentioned past issues with system crashing, though support was helpful in resolving it.